ab/bw/lld said: November 17, 2008 7:04 am PST
The point Sociologica made is a good one. Semioticists frequently argue that language shapes thought. By "language" we really mean the conceptual framework in which the words have meaning relative to each other. I would never question either your intelligence or your experience, I.S., and I certainly wouldn't suggest that your world view doesn't have merit, after all, you are successful in your life by any important measure. But the term "consciousness" in the marxist and marxist feminist frame is very useful here. In this context it means "lens" or "paradigm". It is a logical construct through, or more correctly, against, which one examines the object. In this instance the object is our own society, so we have reflexivity, meaning we examine ourselves as we examine our society.
In one sense, as Sociolgica said, your frame is limited, you need to critical logic of sociology. Simply being a part of society doesn't make you a sociologist any more than having a brain makes you a brain surgeon.
In another sense, though, I.S. is right. Our paradigm shows Sociologica and I what it does because we examine ourselves first, due the reflexivity of our study. So, yeah, I might have kind of a jaundiced view or society, and, yeah, maybe I am arrogant enough to think I know more than you do. I have Master's degree, in (social) SCIENCE!
Also, don't write in word and past into the guest book because the formatting is different and it makes it seem you're writing Arabic. Spelling doesn't count here.